Have you ever tried explaining
the concept of pantomime to a non-Brit?
“Well, it’s based on a children’s
story – but not always – and it involves loads of different characters; a Dame
… which is always a man playing a woman with a huge bosom and a garish
selection of wigs and frocks; a principal boy who is actually a girl – usually
in tights and long boots; a demon or wizard who is trying to steal the
beautiful girl; a simpleton or pair of them; a magic potion, lamp, cow or camel
that everybody is trying to find; ghosts and spooks behind every piece of
scenery; lots of sing-a-longs, chases, dancing for no reason, trips, custard
pies, water and as many “behind you” and “Oh no he isn’t” opportunities as you
can dream up. Oh, and kids … lots of them and all ages dancing, with the
youngest doing what they want to …”.
Hmmm. I bet you lost them
somewhere around the ‘… man playing a
woman” bit. The Americans will assume it’s some bizarre take on ‘The
Birdcage’ and the rest of the world will glance sideways and say to each other,
“They’re British … they are like that”.
I remember being asked in an
article what my take on it was, based on an Adjudicators perspective. This was
my wordy reply: “What should a good pantomime be? It must be a tumbling and
dancing profusion of colour, calamity and corny-ness, all delivered by a
cacophony of caricatures that capture and retain the whole audiences’ interest.
It must contain a solid and engaging story which is told through a well-blended
mixture of song, silliness, slapstick, seasoned sketches, mild seaside
sauciness and all tied together with genuine sincerity. It must gallop along at
a breath taking pace with a plethora of added local references and topical songs,
sketches and gags, consuming the youngest to the eldest in the audience and
demanding their constant attention … and a good deal of their participation.
But ALWAYS with an eye on the tradition and the handed down humour that makes
panto a British institution.” A mouthful I know, but how do you encapsulate in
a paragraph such an important aspect of our theatrical history that is a part
of all of us?
What do you think it is? So many
local companies perform it every year you would think the whole nation would be
expert in it, wouldn’t you?
But from many years of ruminating
and cogitating over all things musical and a good proportion of them being
panto, it appears to me (IMHO) that many are losing sight of what this genre
is.
No, you will be pleased to know
that I am not going to degenerate into a history lesson, but I think that a
good many local performers of this national institution need to take stock of
the ‘what’, ‘why’ and ‘how’ of their panto’s.
To start with, if only I had a
quid for every failed joke in a panto that has been followed by the deliverer
predictably with “Oh well, suit yourselves”. Well actually, they did. Actually,
they didn’t laugh because it wasn’t funny.
Sorry to be blunt, but many are
missing the point.
I have an indicator in observing
a panto that has never let me down yet. I listen for when the kids start
talking. It is a fool-proof sign that the panto has lost their interest and
being the most accurate critics around, kids are invariably right.
The next thing that always
switches them off is clever humour. It makes a handful of adults smile and the
odd one laugh, and I can guarantee that it was undoubtedly a hoot in
rehearsal. Lesson one: a laugh in rehearsal amongst the company is not
automatically replicated when presented to 37 Brownies; and “Oh well, suit
yourselves” after it, doesn’t make them realise what they missed either.
Think about it. What makes kids
laugh? I saw one recently that proved it for the umpteenth time.
The ‘comedy duo’ spent ten minutes on an uninspiring gag (two minutes into which the 5th Beaver Troop were exchanging sweets) at the end of which the under 11’s in the audience suddenly screamed with laughter which made all of the remaining audience also laugh. The reason? He kicked him in the pants. Pure kiddie humour that has had us rolling around since the first yokel gained self employed status as something called a Jester.
The ‘comedy duo’ spent ten minutes on an uninspiring gag (two minutes into which the 5th Beaver Troop were exchanging sweets) at the end of which the under 11’s in the audience suddenly screamed with laughter which made all of the remaining audience also laugh. The reason? He kicked him in the pants. Pure kiddie humour that has had us rolling around since the first yokel gained self employed status as something called a Jester.
It doesn’t have to be clever, it
doesn’t have to be expensive, it just has to be plain old
corny-daft-stupid-juvenile humour with an eye always on honesty and sincerity
in delivery.
“But what about the adults?” I
hear you cry. Well, have you ever noticed that we all have the ability in us to
laugh and latterly, groan at kiddie humour? We never lose it and panto
resurrects that primeval ability to laugh at the simple misfortunes of life and
those who experience them. Add to that the fact there is nothing funnier in
life than hearing a youngster REALLY laughing. It is so infectious and
ultimately, catalytic for an audience.
My next bugbear is inane tracts
of dialogue delivered between two uninspiring characters with no reference to
the audience; it immediately disenfranchises them. Dialogue that seems to go
nowhere and achieves nothing is an element of many (poor) scripts and there are
a good deal of poor ones out there. But as with anything in theatre – and
especially in pantomime – it is in the construction and delivery that it comes
to life. A lot of the time, a panto loses pace and purpose at these points because
the players face each other, talk to each other and consequently exclude the
observers. How do you hold a conversation with another adult in which
you want to involve the kids? Well, you bring them into it by turning
statements into questions; you ask them directly about actions and seek
reactions, you seek agreement and most important of all, you look at them. Not
rocket science I know, but why do so many panto performers not do it? The list
of key ingredients could go on and under the heading of ‘music’ are disclosed
so many more issues that need careful thought and planning.
I have a rule of thumb that songs
should be no more than 2 minutes or 2 verses – otherwise, you lose them again.
Also, interpolated music or scripts that allow you to mix and match songs do it
for a reason: to keep it topical. So, what are all the youngsters singing now?
What, when you get in the car, causes the booster seat to come to life with
lyrics? The skill is blending that with the well worn kid’s favourites … the
downside is how many kids know the traditional children’s songs any more? It is
a fine balancing act, but one that really does need thinking through and
definitely not taking for granted.
Whilst I am on a soap box about
music, where did the piano/keyboard chords and accompanying drum rolls/crashes
disappear to? Remember them? The ones that accompanied the entrance of the Good
Fairy and the menacing signature for the entrance of the Baddie? Similarly, every
misfortune, slip, trip, slap, funny walk and/or appalling gag? They are an
essential element of conditioning the audience when to laugh and what they are supposed to be finding funny! It’s like
a formula; 1. There’s a gag coming (drum/cymbal roll) 2. This is the gag (piano
chord) 3. That was the gag (drum/cymbal crash). It follows a historical,
theatrical formula that subliminally signposts the route to inane, loveable
can’t-help-it-but-laugh humour.
And for some reason, some
companies still seem to think that panto characters are funny per se. I think not. For example, if the
dame is just expected to generate hoots of laughter all night for simply being
a bloke in a frock, think again. The components that are needed for sustainable
laughter value are many: the timing, the asides, the animated facial
expressions that are nearly choreographed, the exquisitely timed ad-libs, the
retorts to the audience, the put-downs to the hecklers, the double-takes, the
knowing glances, the balletic false eyelashes, the “Sissy & Ada” adjustment
of the false bosom, the walk, the accent and never mind what the script
provides … the list is endless.
It is interesting as well to
remember that within panto, there is a wealth of historical and traditional
gags and routines that many who work it well, know and have learned rote: the
ghost gag, the echo gag, the tree of truth, Widow Twankey’s Laundry, the
blackboard gag, the list again is endless and must literally go into the
hundreds. Research them, learn them and work them. Add them into your scripts
and better still, write your own. Research the repertoire and watch what others
do well and not so well. Also, understand the characters and how they interact.
Panto is a recipe of essential ingredients and optional flavourings to suit the
palette, the pocket and the personalities of the performers – and not least of
all, the expectations of the paying public.
Additionally, the basic building
blocks in many pantomimes seem to have been taken out. When did slapstick die?! Where have
all the custard pies gone? Whatever happened to the thunder-flashes, the smoke,
the water, the false props that break, the trips, the prat-falls, the
meaningless chases, all of which (and dozens more beside) make up that essential
added business that some scripts no longer seem to give you, but which panto
demands and most importantly, the audience expects. Much of it is the doing, the interpretation, the heritage. If you don't know, read a book! There are some belters out there from people who have been there, bought the t-shirt and probably worn the lashes!
And then there is the TRUE
spirit of panto, which all productions should be striving to fundamentally
encapsulate; the spirit of Christmas, the sentiment of the season, the
goodwill, the festivities and the fun, but most of important of all, the magic.
And by ‘magic’ I don’t mean the conjuring tricks and the gimmicks. It is that
age-old, feel-good factor that is associated with the same mind set that really
does make kids believe that Santa is real, that reindeers can fly, that good
will and kindness are not one day-a-year qualities and all those other genuine
human foibles that make it so charming and innocent and which can make kids in
the audience sit wide eyed and open mouthed one second and scream with
uncontrollable delight the next. Am I being overly romantic and unrealistic? I
really don’t think so, but I do know one thing. Even trying to achieve that quality of ‘panto product’ is
probably the hardest theatrical experience you will ever attempt and if you do
achieve it, it is in my opinion, one of the most rewarding.
The final issue in this broad personal
perspective on what makes a good panto, is keeping the story topical. Local
references, personalities in the media that kids love to love or to hate, their
catchphrases, their misfortunes, the stars, the cartoon characters, the shows
on children’s TV, the sports stars, the pop stars, fashion, slang, the adverts that
they annoyingly recite parrot fashion in the playground, there is a wealth of
stuff to be going at to make your panto a success. They really are a
contemporary snap shot of the tastes and traditions of ‘now’ and if you can
capture just that aspect, you will be head and shoulders above many
productions.
But most important of all, read
it, see it, live it and then perform it through a child’s eyes – and please
– keep crudity out. Saucy asides need intelligent construction and delivery and
they are a world away from vulgarity. It takes immense thought and skill to get
a belly laugh out of the adults for one gag because they got the innuendo and
then giggles out of the kids who tuned into a wholly different facet that
satisfied their innocent understanding and humour. Let’s save at least one
bastion of our heritage from dumbing down to the level of the gutter!
Parts of the theatre publishing
industry are seeing their largest business growth in the pantomime sector.
There are some great new writers and new works out there which are fresh and original
BUT, not all have a keen eye on traditional structure, story, humour and
presentation. I would simply say, shop around. Don’t stick with the same stack
of dusty scripts you have in a cupboard. Equally, trendy and clever hardly ever
works. If a script needs to add in weird and wonderful plot devices, characters
or scenes that have nothing to do with the story, give them a wide berth.
So, keep it simple, involve the
kids at every opportunity, blend traditional with contemporary references and
twists and you have the potential for success. But the actual success lies in
the delivery and understanding that panto delivery, phrasing and audience reaction
are like nothing else in theatre that a performer will ever, could ever do. And
taking it all for granted and assuming you are funny are the two big killers!
And don’t ever forget…it’s behind
you!
No comments:
Post a Comment